2 May 2015 - Sunday
Bogotá is fascinating. It is much more European than Mexico City, or than what I've heard of Quito or even São Paulo, yet so far from London that one simply has to create a new category. Much of the city is constructed of those cheap cement-and-brick structures so common in South/Central America, sometimes painted in bright colors and reaching up to 10 stories but always looking like the minimum viable structure. Nothing aesthetic about them. Kenya was the same way, which surprised me at first; I suppose I hadn't realized that housing might be similar across the developing world because of how tight money is or perhaps because of how fast their populations are growing.
And I suppose that's what gets me – Bogotá doesn't really feel like the "developing world," at least not in any strong sense of the word. But Colombia's GDP per capita is lower than most Latin American countries except for the very poorest ones: Bolivia, Paraguay, Ecuador. Even Venezuela has a higher average income because of oil incomes, though it's hardly a more pleasant place to live for any except the oil barons. Colombia does have successful banks, some beautiful buildings, thriving companies, and fairly rich natural resources (without being too dependent on them). But the attitudes in Columbia seem to maintain a third-world-ness, despite the country's prosperity and growth. There is always the problem of the internal violence, which has been constant for decades, but probably a larger issue is the abuse of institutional power. It happens in all nations, of course, but it is more pronounced in societies without a strict rule of law or dissemination of basic rights and equalities. Raise up the poor, raise up the indigenous population, raise up the women and children in a society, and you improve it vastly. Instill (somehow) an internal respect for that equality and at least a marginal desire to follow the law in order to show that respect, and improve it even more. In Colombia I see a great desire to do respect equality, but a lack of desire to respect it by following laws (in the governing classes particularly) seems to stymie many efforts. Naturally it is more complicated than this, but that's my go at it.
This spills over into the aesthetic sense of a society. There was a time, I think, when the poor members of society still built nice homes if they could… Now, is that true? The poor of ancient Rome, of ancient Athens, of 10th-century Paris, of 17th-century London, where did they live? The poor of ancient China or of the Aztec empire, where did they live? Were their homes any nicer than the inexpensive cement-and-brick eyesores which blanket the developing world? When individuals are poor, genuinely poor, I almost invariably notice a decreased lack of concern for surroundings because of their concern for basic needs. This is true in the trailer parks in Washington state, the rough side of Salt Lake City, the rural villages of Kenya, and the cramped urban housing of Mexico. And it's true here in Colombia, which has a bit more trash and a bit less nice architecture than I would like. But it is it more true in some of those places than in others? And if so, why would that be? Do people keep things nice when they take pride in their surroundings? And is it hard to take pride in what you have if others surrounding you have much more? People can learn not to compare, of course, but comparison is a natural reaction. Everything I study, everything I see in my travels, points toward at least one conclusion: equality of outcomes is more important than Westerners like to think. Unless they are socialist, of course. This seems to imply a listing of principles, in order of priority:
1) All individuals in a society should have a basic level of comfort and freedom from want.
2) All individuals in a society should work for their own benefit and the benefit of the community as their abilities permit.
3) Equality of outcomes should be maximized as much as possible given (1) and (2).
4) Individual liberty should be as great as possible given (1), (2), and (3).
But this is no liberal project – it is a semi-socialist, redistributionary, perfectionist political program! And while I support fairly intense redistribution, I am cautious about socialism (because of its authoritarian tendencies) and perfectionism (because I don't trust human leaders to select and carry out programs which make individuals truly happy). Indeed, the major problem with items 1-3 in this list is human fallibility – I don't trust human beings (in perpetuity) with the degree of power implied by these items. Maximizing the quality of outcomes while maintaining a base level of comfort is theoretically attractive, but how could we make it work practically?
However, I digress. Political philosophy has certainly captured my interest. Most who read this blog will just smile patiently, I hope. Now we get to the action of my first day.
My whirlwind exploration of Bogotá was genuinely lovely. It began slowly – I tried to take a bus out to the tourist area and ended up fairly distant from my destination, so I walked down the city's main street and soon found myself in the middle of a protest/march/parade. Apparently it happens every first of May, their Labor Day, and I have since heard that this is true in Paris, Turkey, and perhaps elsewhere. It was loud and disjointed, no real theme as far as I could tell, but I was interested by the scene nevertheless. Only after encountering increasingly long lines of riot police on the street did I begin to think that I might be in a bit of danger; I later learned that the march is often accompanied by bombs and teargas and that I did well to leave the route. I walked about for a while after that, but due to the holiday most of the museums I wanted to visit were closed. Finally I decided to check the bike tour which had been highly recommended online.
 |
| Montserrate, the chapel which sits high above the city. |
I discovered the shop after a great deal of searching. It was run by a nice young man, and we talked while I reserved a spot and paid, but with an extra hour and a half to kill I decided I didn't want to sit around. In fact, I don't think I could have done so if I wanted – I get surprisingly antsy when traveling by myself. So I made my way to a nearby mountain, which is capped by a beautiful white chapel and gives us absolutely stunning view of Bogotá, and took a train up. It was worth every moment, even though it made me late to my bike tour.
 |
| The view from Montserrate. |
As I scurried down the hill, failing to find an open taxi only at the very moment I needed it most, I ran into a group of tourists on bikes. After a little verification, I was certain it was the right group (they had started at the time I was signed up for) and they had someone bring me a bike. It was a lovely ride – through the old English and German neighborhood (remarkably European), down the main road which had been lined with riot police just hours before, through the great parks, past walls of incredible street art, to the new justice building in the central plaza. Along the way our guide mused on (rather than recited) a script which included political repression, homosexual rights in Colombia, social justice, drugs and their trafficking, indigenous rights, the art of conversation, conflict resolution, and a great deal more. It was fascinating. The basic feeling I came away with was that a massive mistrust exists between the government and the majority of the citizens of Colombia, fueled by actions on both sides. as for our group, it was composed of two Swiss, a German, two Irish (?), an Israeli, an American, and two Colombian guides – so cool. One of the Swiss, a woman, is here working with the Red Cross for a full year and is clearly a wise, humble person. I immensely enjoyed the opportunity to interface with them a little and see their perspectives on the world – it's one of the main reasons I travel.
 |
| Our bike tour on one of the side streets in Bogotá |
When the tour finished, we arrived back at the bike shop to discover that it was a different one than where I had paid! Apparently there are two bike tours, which surprised me, and I had mixed them up when I met the group on the street. But I enjoyed the experience so much that I just paid the price over again. In fact, all in all I probably spent double what I planned in Bogotá for various misunderstandings (and conveniences), but it was totally worth the stop.